How to Deal with Creative Lending and the Lenders Behind It

When it comes to creative lending, you are likely most familiar with the “conventional” forms of non-conventional real estate investing: the subject-to deal, the lease-option deal and owner financing. Many of the “gurus” promote these types of real estate deals as a way to get around traditional financing issues like bad credit, no credit, no cash for a down payment and the “need for speed” in order to save a property from foreclosure. All of these types of deals can be done to good effect and can benefit all parties involved in the real estate transaction. Furthermore, they are relatively easy to understand and can be explained fairly easily to a motivated seller or buying partner.
However, while these strategies are fairly common on the real estate investing stage at this point, actually dealing with the “lenders” is not nearly so simple an issue. While you can do these transactions without dealing much with your future relationship with the lender, you will better protect yourself and any other parties involved if you understand some of the pitfalls that can arise during creative financing transactions.
One of the biggest issues that I have noticed colleagues and beginning  real estate investors  encounter is with subject-to transactions. When you do a subject-to transaction, the common perception is that the responsibility for the transaction is still entirely the original homeowner’s. Now, this can be done, and it is how you should structure your subject-to deals. That way, if everything just blows up in your face then you can simply walk away (of course, it is dishonest and irresponsible to ever deliberately plan on doing this when you set up this type of transaction, but you do need to protect yourself – especially if you sell the property again later on down the road and that person does not keep up their end of the bargain). However, many people do not realize that in a subject-to deal, they can actually be held partially responsible for the debt on the house by the homeowner, the lender or both if the deal is structured incorrectly even though the mortgage is not in their name.
Another common issue is with owner-financing. Owner-financing is when the owner of the house basically takes out a note on the house for the buyer. The owner retains the deed to the house as collateral until the new loan is paid off. This is a great way to get around problems with the current “credit crunch” and also for people who want a higher price in a poor market to get that price since buyers will often pay more money if they cannot get a traditional loan. However, many owners do not realize the many complications that go into owning a note, and they may just want to get their money out at some point. When this happens, if the loan is not worded correctly then the new note-holder may be able to take aggressive steps to try and force the buyer into foreclosure. Conversely, a poorly worded note can also enable a delinquent buyer to fight eviction and foreclosure for months or even years without paying a dime to the note holder.
Author info
Peter Vekselman has been successfully investing in real estate since 1996. He has completed over 1200 real estate deals, owned a construction company, been a private lender, and owned a property management company. Peter currently works with clients all over the US helping them achieve riches in real estate investing. For more information please visit www.CoachingByPeter.com.

Related Posts

• How to Line Up Qualified Buyers So That You Can Flip Properties
  In the last article, we talked about how you can still flip properties – literally overnight in some cases – in this economy. However, the key to this type of speed actually lies in your willingness and ability to network and set up buyer connections ahead of time so that when a good, qualifying dea...
• What If I Just Want to Flip?
  We have spent a lot of time talking about short sales recently. This is because in many ways, flipping short sales has taken the place of flipping contracts and properties themselves. It is not because those types of deals are no longer available, but instead largely due to the fact that most buyers...
• Understanding the Difference Between Transactional Funding and Simultaneous Closings (Transactional Funding, Part 4)
  Historically, simultaneous closings were a great way for real estate investors, buyers and sellers to all get their “piece of the pie” very quickly in a real estate flip. Simultaneous closings occur when a seller signs a contract selling the property to a real estate investor. This contract is put i...
• When Transactional Funding Alone Won’t Work (Transactional Funding, Part 3)
  Now that you understand how transactional funding works, it probably has taken a pretty big load off your mind. Turns out, despite the new laws that require your name to be on the deed of a property that you sell, you can still get funding that is not a risk to you or the lender without having to ha...
• A Basic Introduction to Transactional Funding (Transactional Funding, Part 2)
  In today’s lending environment, most lenders will not lend money for a transaction unless the name of the owner of a property is on the deed to the property. Lenders say that this is because they are attempting to prevent lending and real estate fraud. They say that it helps them insure that the pro...